Functional graded materials (FGM) are a class of materials with engineered continuous compositional gradients through the plate thickness. This example applies the netSEM approach to an aluminum FGM, produced via sequential alloy casting using planar solidification, to quantify the < Processing | Microstructure | Performance > relationships. This is an example of netSEM applied to a non-degradation problem, and demonstrates the generality of this network modeling approach to other types of complex systems. The material has a continuous gradient in zinc (Zn) and magnesium (Mg) concentrations through the plate thickness. This subsequently produces a gradient in strengthening mechanisms from a dominant precipitate-strengthened aluminum alloy (AA) (Zn-based AA-7055) to a dominant strain-hardenable aluminum alloy (Mg-based AA-5456). Therefore, the material is simultaneously strengthened via solid solution strengthening and precipitation strengthening.
The data set comprises two aspects of the aluminum gradient material: composition (processing) and hardness (performance). Data was collected at six different x-locations (same composition along x) for each of the six different z-locations (different composition along z). For every hardness indent, two compositional measurements were taken, making the dataset a total of 72 observations. A Buehler 1600-4963 indenter with 300 gf load was used to measure Vickers hardness (HV) on polished samples as a function of position along the compositional gradient (z-direction). The compositional gradient was characterized using X-ray Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (XEDS) in an FEI Nova NanoLab 200 at 10 KV beam energy. All parameters like working distance, accelerating voltage, current, dwell time, and dead time were held constant so that XEDS measurements from different samples/locations could be compared without bias.
The aging experiments show MgZn2 (\(\eta\)) as a potential precipitate. The volume fraction of \(\eta\) precipitates require a 2:1|Zn:Mg stoichiometry and therefore the volume fraction of precipitates are limited by the minimum of either the Zn/2 or Mg concentrations. For the compositional range of the FGM, this minimum is always Zn/2; therefore, \(\eta\) concentration is proportional to the Zn(at%) concentration. This means that no Zn was retained in solid solution, and \(\eta\) and Al(Mg) (i.e.,Mg retained in solid solution or Mg-excess) were used as variables for network model.
Resulting dataframe contains Position : Z as the main exogenous variable and Hardness as the endogenous variable (response). The other columns in the data set (Mg (at%), Zn (at%), MgZn2 (\(\eta\)), and Mg-excess) are variables representing the mechanistic variables in the netSEM analysis.
## Load the metal data set data(metal) ?metal ## Run netSEMp1 model ans1 <- netSEMp1(metal, str = TRUE) ## Plot the network model for principle 1 plot(ans1, cutoff = c(0.3,0.6,0.9)) ## Run netSEMp2 model ans2 <- netSEMp2(metal, str = TRUE, criterion = "AIC") ## Plot the network model for principle 2 plot(ans2, cutoff = c(0.3,0.6,0.9))
“Hardness” is the endogenous and all other variables are considered as exogenous.
The network diagram shows a logarithmic relationship between Mg-excess and Hardness, and a exponential relationship between \(\eta\) phase and Hardness. Visualization of the relationship between Mg-excess and Hardness indicate that functional forms (Log and Solid Solution(SS)) have similar shapes within ranges of the variables collected. The domain knowledge biases the selection of SS functional form for the network model betweeen Al(Mg) (or Mg-excess) and Hardness over the selection of the Log function, as it is consistent with the Mg concentration primarily contributing through solid-solution hardening. The Exp function with respect to the \(\eta\) concentration could be consistent with diffusional mechanisms controlling the precipitate distribution and thus the strengthening behavior.
Verma, A.K., French, R.H. & Carter, J.L.W. “Physics-Informed Network Models: a Data Science Approach to Metal Design”, Integr Mater Manuf Innov (2017) 6: 279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0104-5
The authors would like to acknowledge Alcoa/Arconic Alloy Technology
Division for providing the material and Army Research Office Short Term
Innovative Research program: W911NF-14-0549 for funding.
The data and R-analytics code utilized for the paper can be found at https://cwru-msl.github.io/MRL17/.